Explore the researched article When faith is used to harm: historical examples, difficult texts and practical questions for religious authority.

The Jesus Inquiry exists to examine Jesus, the Gospels and religious belief through careful, peaceful inquiry. We welcome disagreement and affirm the equal dignity of people of every religion and none.

We reject hatred, dehumanization, threats, harassment, discrimination and violence. No text or interpretation presented here is offered as a justification for harming others.

Disagreement and human dignity

Readers may question religious claims, challenge interpretations, criticise institutions and examine historical conduct. Agreement about faith is not a condition of belonging here. Criticism should address identifiable ideas, actions and evidence, with care for the people involved.

We reject antisemitism, anti-Muslim hatred, hostility toward Christians, and hostility toward people of other religions or no religion. Our commitment to dignity extends to everyone, including people of every ethnicity, nationality, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability. We do not portray people as inherently inferior or dangerous because of who they are.

Read historical texts in context

A quotation is presented for examination. Its inclusion does not establish the editor’s agreement with it. Where a passage contains hostility or violence, our commentary should identify the speaker, setting, intended audience and relevant differences of interpretation, and address harmful uses of that passage.

Passages about the trial and death of Jesus must never be used to assign collective blame to Jewish people, past or present. Prophecy discussions must not identify living populations as targets for punishment or encourage attempts to bring about predicted violence.

Standards for our own writing

  • Show the sources. Attribute quotations and interpretations accurately and give readers enough context to check them.
  • Distinguish kinds of claim. Separate historical evidence, theological interpretation and personal conviction. Explain uncertainty and substantial disagreement.
  • Describe people precisely. Name the particular author, institution, period or school of thought concerned. A religion’s members do not all think or act alike.
  • Keep context attached. Apply these standards to titles, summaries, images and promotional excerpts as well as full articles.
  • Review sensitive material. Before public release, material with a substantial risk of misrepresenting a tradition or encouraging hostility should receive appropriate subject-matter and, where needed, legal review.
  • Correct substantive errors. Check concerns against the sources, correct errors and explain substantial corrections with a dated note.

These standards guide the published collection and future work. Read the current content and review status.

Participation

No public comments or reader-posted articles are enabled. If participation is introduced, contributions will be reviewed before publication. Threats, targeted harassment, disclosure of private information, hateful abuse and encouragement of violence may lead to rejection or removal. Respectful criticism and disagreement remain welcome.

Raise a concern

Record the page link, the exact wording, the reason for your concern and a source that helps us check it. Prepare a correction note. The tool lets you copy a report; it does not send one or collect your details.

This statement describes our editorial commitments. It does not remove legal obligations or guarantee that material is beyond criticism or complaint.